Study

Study: Cannabis use does not lower IQ

While opponents of legalizing weed pointed to its deleterious effect on IQ, this argument was unsubstantiated: while previous research had not established a link between lower IQ and marijuana use , a study published in Brain and Behavior confirms that weed does not lower the IQ of its aficionados.

Analyzing a sample of 5,162 men in early adulthood through their late fifties, researchers determined that participants with a history of cannabis use experienced
“significantly less cognitive decline”
over the course of their lives than non-cannabis users.

These results confirm those of previous studies.

Among cannabis users, neither age of initiation nor frequency of use was associated with negative effects on cognition.
In their press release, the authors of this longitudinal study state that
“these results are consistent with most existing studies”.
.
In fact, other longitudinal studies, such as the one by John Hopkins University in Baltimore, published as early as 1999 in the

American Journal of Epidemiology,
or the one published earlier this year in the
JAMA (Journal of the American Medical Association)
by researchers affiliated with Harvard Medical School and the McGovern Institute for Brain Research at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), both converge on the same conclusion, despite different protocols.

In the latter, researchers collected structural and functional brain imaging (fMRI) data from a cohort of patients newly licensed to use medical cannabis at the start of the study and one year later. Similar data were also collected from healthy controls (non-cannabis users). Result: ” no
no association between changes in frequency of cannabis use and brain activation
“.

Alcohol and benzodiazepines, available over the counter in all Western countries, have a proven and marked effect on IQ, with a reduction of up to 30% for heavy alcoholics.

In US states and countries that have legalized cannabis, consumption of tobacco, alcohol and hard drugs is declining

A wide-ranging international study confirms what many public health players have been predicting: the legalization of medical cannabis is not only disrupting markets, it is also profoundly changing consumer behavior. Tobacco, amphetamines and alcohol are seeing their use decline, while cannabidiol (CBD) and THC-infused beverages are increasingly appealing to younger generations. At a time when France continues to ignore this debate, these data provide food for thought worldwide on the place of cannabis in health policies and the economy.

When medical cannabis replaces tobacco and amphetamines

The study, carried out by German and Lebanese researchers, is based on figures from twenty countries. It establishes a strong correlation between the opening of a legal medical cannabis market and a decline in certain risky forms of consumption. Tobacco first and foremost: the data show that cigarette use is down where medical cannabis is freely available. The same applies to amphetamines, stimulants whose use is considered particularly worrying. In other words, medical cannabis doesn’t just add to the arsenal of psychoactive products, it replaces some of them. The authors speak of a significant “substitution effect”. This conclusion, though measured – the study insists that these are population correlations, not individual evidence of causality – nevertheless suggests that legalization can be a remarkable lever for risk reduction.

A booming market

These beneficial effects are not limited to protecting the mental health of hyper-anxious patients. They also have significant economic side-effects.   Following legalization, sales of medical cannabis rose by an average of 26% in the countries concerned. Of course, the United States, considered a “special case” due to the size of its market, is pulling the figures up. But even excluding them, the trend remains solid: over 20 tonnes more every year. For the researchers, this demonstrates that a well-regulated market can generate sustainable economic benefits. The key, they insist, lies in clear legal frameworks, demanding production standards and simplified access for patients. Removing administrative barriers and investing in consumer education/information appear to be essential conditions for the sustainability of the industry. In a context where many governments are seeking to diversify and increase their tax revenues, this argument carries considerable weight.

CBD to treat alcoholism

The study is part of a growing body of scientific research. In the United States, a study this year showed that cannabidiol, a non-psychotropic molecule derived from cannabis, could reduce voluntary alcohol consumption. The researchers observed a significant reduction in the desire to drink and in withdrawal symptoms in the subjects studied. Another publication, in the journal Nature, highlights the potential of CBD to treat alcohol addiction, reducing the risk of relapse and protecting the brain from the neurotoxic effects of alcohol abuse. This work holds out the promise of a therapeutic revolution in the field of addictology.

At the same time, social habits are changing rapidly in the United States. A survey of young professionals shows that a third of workers from generations Y and Z now prefer THC drinks to traditional alcoholic beverages at afterwork parties. The phenomenon illustrates a cultural mutation in which conviviality no longer necessarily involves alcohol, but rather alternatives perceived as more modern and, for some, less harmful.

When will we open up to the old continent?

Taken together, these signals converge on one idea: medical cannabis and CBD are not just a new market, but also a tool for transforming behavior. By reducing the place of tobacco, amphetamines and alcohol, these substances could profoundly reshape consumption habits. This is yet another argument in support of the idea that the legalization of cannabis, whether for therapeutic or recreational use, represents a major health and social opportunity. Some countries, like France, with its record deficit and worrying alcoholism problem, should embrace this opportunity rather than wage a costly war against it, both for the state and its citizens.  

Youth, saliva tests, rising consumption: what science really says about cannabis

As the legalization debate heats up in the run-up to Donald Trump’s reclassification of cannabis, an eminent American researcher is shattering a number of preconceptions. During a webinar organized by the federal agency SAMHSA, Johns Hopkins University professor Ryan Vandrey defended a finer, more scientific regulation of cannabinoids, while denouncing the shortcomings of public policies in terms of prevention, road testing and product analysis.

ZEWEED with Marijuana Moments

Legalization does not increase consumption among young people

Ryan Vandrey, an experimental psychologist and behavioral pharmacology researcher at Johns Hopkins, opened his talk with a reminder that cannabis remains the most widely consumed illicit substance in the United States. Yet, contrary to common fears, consumption among young people does not follow that of adults.
Consumption among minors is one of the most sensitive subjects linked to legalization “, he explains, ” but the figures show stability, and even a drop in some cases.” Drawing on data from California since 1996, Vandrey asserts that rates of use among 8th, 10th and 12th graders have not budged, and have even been trending downward in recent years.

Delta-8, CBG, HHC: cannabinoids outdo science

For the researcher, one of the main challenges lies in the poor understanding of cannabis-based products. ” The industry is innovating faster than research,” laments the practitioner. Instead of focusing on the simple delta-9 THC content, which legally distinguishes hemp from cannabis in the USA, Vandrey advocates an approach based on the cognitive and behavioral effects of the products.
In particular, he highlights the differences between the dominant cannabinoids: THC and its derivatives (such as delta-8) can cause addiction, withdrawal or cognitive disorders. CBD, on the other hand, shows no signs of addiction or problematic use, even when combined with low doses of THC. CBG, another cannabinoid studied, seems to act in a similar way to CBD.
But delta-8, though psychoactive, remains poorly regulated: ” A double dosage of delta-8 produces the same effects as a standard dosage of delta-9 “, explains Vandrey, while pointing out the regulatory aberration: the former is freely accessible if extracted from hemp, the latter is still classified as a controlled substance.

Saliva tests, blood thresholds: unsuitable tools

Another stumbling block: tests to assess driving ability. Vandrey and his team found that the standard sobriety tests used by police often fail to detect cannabis-induced motor impairment.
Subjects who ingested 25 mg of THC showed clear psychomotor deficits… yet had THC blood levels below the legal thresholds in several states. The reason: oral consumption produces significant effects, but low plasma levels. Conversely, some people who tested positive on a urine screening test had only taken CBD, whose low residual THC content was sufficient to cause a positive result.

Terpenes: real effects or overmarketing?

Long ignored by research, terpenes – the aromatic compounds found in cannabis – are now being promoted by brands for their supposed effects. He cites a study conducted with researcher Ethan Russo, in which the addition of the terpene D-limonene to pure THC reduced anxiety, paranoia and racing heart… without altering the cognitive or physical effects of THC. Conversely, alpha-pinene, often touted as an antidote to forgetfulness or anxiety, showed no significant effect in the trials.

Schizophrenia, THC levels, labelling: avenues to explore

The talk also addressed the controversial links between cannabis and schizophrenia. Despite the doubling of annual consumption in the United States, cases of schizophrenia remain stable. Vandrey acknowledges a correlation between heavy use and early or severe symptoms of psychosis, but causality remains uncertain.
He also highlights gender differences in problematic cannabis use: women become dependent more quickly, have more withdrawal symptoms and respond less well to treatment.
Another crucial point: product potency is not synonymous with impact. “It’ s the dose that counts, not the concentration,” says Vandrey, describing the phenomenon of self-titration. Experienced users will naturally adjust their intake, whatever the THC content. Diet also influences absorption, especially by the oral route: a fatty meal clearly increases the bioavailability of cannabis, unlike most drugs.
Beyond these observations, the researcher calls for a reform of cannabis regulation, based on objective criteria: formulation, route of administration, real effects, dosage. He also calls for better supervision of retail products, and more resources for research.
We need to move away from a global regulation of cannabis and think in terms of the type of product: THC-rich cannabis, CBD-rich cannabis, or something else. Otherwise, we’ll miss the real issues. “insists the psychologist.

One plant, a thousand molecules: science continues to unravel the mysteries of cannabis

The last point raised is the rapid evolution of research into the chemical composition of cannabis. Recent studies have highlighted new compounds, such as cannabielsoxa, and novel aromatic profiles linked to genetics, cultivation or drying.
A May 2025 study identified 33 genetic markers strongly influencing cannabinoid production, including a massive set of genes associated with THC-rich varieties.
These advances pave the way for precision genetic breeding programs to develop varieties with targeted therapeutic profiles.
But one doubt hangs in the air: federal policy, especially under the Trump administration, could put the brakes on this momentum. The word “marijuana” is now one of a score of topics deemed “sensitive” by the National Cancer Institute, requiring prior hierarchical validation before publication.
At a time when cannabis is gaining ground in American legislation, science is struggling to keep pace with the industrialization of the sector. Vandrey’s plea is a reminder of the urgent need for more detailed, data-driven regulation, and for research capable of sorting out placebo effects, marketing and therapeutic potential.

Study: THC improves memory in aged rats!

As cannabis use increases among the elderly, researchers are taking a closer look at its effects on cognitive function as we age. A recent study published in the journal Psychopharmacology suggests that cannabis, and more specifically its main psychoactive ingredient THC, may improve certain types of memory in elderly rats.

The researchers found that acute exposure to cannabis smoke improved working memory in aged male rats, but impaired it in aged females. Conversely, chronic oral administration of THC improved working memory in elderly rats of both sexes, without affecting their spatial memory or having any impact on younger rats.
Cannabis use is becoming increasingly common among senior citizens. In the United States, between 2015 and 2023, the percentage of people over 65 who have used cannabis in the past year almost tripled. Many consume it regularly, often to relieve chronic pain, anxiety or sleep disorders. Yet while cannabis is known to impair memory and attention in young adults, its effects on the aging brain, which is more vulnerable to cognitive decline, remain little studied.

Mouse stones…

Previous research on elderly mice had suggested that low doses of THC could improve cognitive function, a surprising finding that raised the possibility that cannabis could alleviate some age-related amnesic disorders under specific conditions.
This new study, led by Jennifer L. Bizon, aimed to explore these hypotheses in more detail. The aim was to understand how cannabis affects two types of memory: working memory, dependent on the prefrontal cortex, and spatial memory, linked to the hippocampus. The methods of administration used (smoking and oral ingestion) reflect typical human consumption.
Barry Setlow, co-author of the study, explains that their interest initially stems from a preclinical research program into the effects of cannabis smoke on cognition and behavior, aiming for greater translational relevance to human models.
Three experiments were carried out on young adult (6-9 months) and aged (24-28 months) rats. The first involved exposure to cannabis smoke and assessment via memory tasks using a touch screen. The second evaluated the impact of chronic oral THC consumption over three weeks, while the third analyzed THC metabolism.

… Who regain their memory

Notable results: in aged male rats, cannabis smoke significantly improved working memory, especially in the most challenging situations, while it degraded performance in aged females. Chronic oral ingestion of THC improved working memory in both aged sexes, with no noticeable effect on the young. No significant change was observed for spatial memory in either group.
These results intrigue researchers, not least because THC appeared to benefit only working memory (prefrontal) and not that involving the hippocampus. Differences in THC metabolism according to age and sex do not seem sufficient to fully explain these cognitive effects.
Several hypotheses have been put forward: the reduction of excessive inhibition of the aging prefrontal cortex by activation of cannabinoid receptors, and the anti-inflammatory effects of THC, known to reduce age-related cerebral inflammation.
With regard to the deterioration observed in aged females, the difference in initial performance between males and females could explain why THC benefits those with lower initial performance (aged males) and harms females, already performing well.

Results concordant with those of a Danish study

However, the authors point out certain limitations: obvious biological differences between rats and humans, limited number of cognitive tasks evaluated, low doses of THC used, and non-exhaustive modes of administration.
These results are nevertheless in line with a long-term Danish study showing that cannabis users suffered less cognitive decline over 44 years.
The researchers recommend studying the effects of other cannabis compounds, such as CBD, as well as longer-term research to assess the persistence of THC’s beneficial effects and better understand the biological mechanisms explaining age- and gender-related differences.
According to Setlow, the long-term goal remains to expand research to determine precisely how cannabis and cannabinoids influence cognitive performance in aging, paving the way for potential treatments for age-related cognitive decline.

ZEWEED with 420 Intel

U.S. federal study confirms CBD’s effectiveness in treating alcoholism

A new federally-funded study published in the respected journal Nature indicates that CBD reduces alcohol-related withdrawal symptoms and the risk of relapse, while offering neuroprotective effects. Conducted by the University of California at San Diego, this research on animal models reinforces the idea already espoused that CBD could be a treatment of choice against alcoholism.

Animal model

Researchers at the University of California, San Diego, set out to understand how this non-intoxicating cannabinoid might act in people suffering from alcohol use disorder (AUD). The results of this rodent study provide further evidence of CBD’s potential role in reducing the effects of alcohol. A total of 166 rats were included. Two cohorts received intravenous doses of synthetic CBD (30 or 60 mg/kg), while another group served as a control. Thirty minutes after administration, a battery of tests assessed how CBD could attenuate the behavioral and neurobiological dimensions of alcohol dependence.

Withdrawal aid and relapse prevention

The authors conclude that CBD is effective in this regard by ” modulating neuronal excitability and preventing neurodegeneration, supporting its therapeutic potential for AUD and providing mechanistic insights for future research”.
“The present study demonstrates that chronic cannabidiol (CBD) administration attenuates behavioral and neurobiological manifestations of alcohol dependence in rodent models,” they write. Specifically, CBD reduced alcohol intake and withdrawal symptoms, decreased relapse-like behaviors, normalized neuronal excitability in the basolateral amygdala (BLA) and prevented alcohol-induced neurodegeneration in striatal regions associated with reward and habit formation.   ” Furthermore, CBD did not potentiate the sedative effects of alcohol, as evidenced by the lack of difference in the duration of righting reflex loss or locomotor activity during alcohol intoxication, while increasing the time spent in the open field center, indicative of anxiolytic effects. These results underline the potential therapeutic utility of CBD for alcohol use disorder (AUD), and provide mechanistic evidence for its modes of action. . ”

Concordant results

For example, researchers at the University of Sydney recently published a study in mice showing that CBD reduces rates of binge drinking episodes as well as blood alcohol concentrations. The results of another study, published in the journal Molecular Psychiatry, also indicate that a single dose of 800 milligrams of CBD can help manage some alcohol cravings in people with AUD, arguing for the use of this cannabis component as a potential treatment option for problem drinkers. In addition, federally funded research into the effects of cannabis on alcohol consumption found that people who used marijuana just before drinking subsequently consumed fewer alcoholic beverages and reported lower alcohol cravings.

CBD to fight THC addiction?

This comes on the heels of a survey analysis published in March, which found that three out of four young adults say they substitute cannabis for alcohol at least once a week – a “booming” trend that reflects the “rapid expansion” of the market for hemp-based products. A report by Bloomberg Intelligence (BI) observes that across different demographics, cannabis is increasingly being used as an alternative to alcohol and even soft drinks, as more companies – including large multi-state operators (MSOs) – expand their offerings. These findings are largely consistent with a growing body of research showing that cannabis – whether hemp, which is federally legal, or marijuana, which is still prohibited – is being adopted as a substitute by many Americans in the context of reform. An earlier YouGov survey revealed, for example, that a majority of Americans consider regular alcohol consumption to be more harmful than regular marijuana use. However, more Americans say they prefer to drink alcohol than use cannabis, despite the health risks. Another survey published in January shows that more than half of marijuana users claim to drink less alcohol – or no alcohol at all – after using cannabis.

Americans prefer cannabis to alcohol

Another survey – supported by the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) and released in December – shows that young adults are nearly three times more likely to use marijuana than alcohol on a daily or near-daily basis. The survey provides more precise age-specific results than a similar report published the previous year, concluding that more Americans overall smoke marijuana daily than drink alcohol daily – and that drinkers are more likely than cannabis users to feel they would benefit from a reduction in their consumption. A separate study, published last year in the journal Addiction, reached a similar conclusion: there are more American adults who use marijuana daily than adults who drink alcohol daily. In December, BI also published the results of a survey indicating that cannabis substitution for alcohol is “exploding” as legalization progresses at the state level and relative perceptions of risk evolve. A significant proportion of Americans also report substituting marijuana for cigarettes and painkillers.

Alcoholic beverage makers swallow hard

Another BI analysis, published last September, projects that the spread of the cannabis legalization movement will continue to pose a “significant threat” to the alcohol industry, with survey data suggesting that more and more people are replacing alcoholic beverages, such as beer and wine, with cannabis. A further study on the impact of marijuana use on the use of other drugs, published in December, suggests that, for many, cannabis may act as a less dangerous substitute, helping to reduce the consumption of alcohol, methamphetamine and opioids such as morphine. In Canada, where marijuana is legal at the federal level, one study found that legalization was “associated with lower beer sales”, suggesting a substitution effect. These analyses are consistent with other recent data on comparative perceptions of alcohol and cannabis in the United States. A Gallup poll, for example, indicates that respondents consider cannabis less harmful than alcohol, tobacco and nicotine e-cigarettes – and that more adults now smoke cannabis than cigarettes. Another survey, published last year by the American Psychiatric Association (APA) and Morning Consult, also concludes that Americans consider marijuana significantly less harmful than cigarettes, alcohol and opioids – and that they find cannabis less addictive than each of these substances, as well as less addictive than technology.

 

Zeweed with Marijuana Moments and Nature

America’s after-hours clubs are fueled by THC

In the US, afterworks are going green. Millennials and Gen Z, aware of the ravages of binge drinking, are increasingly turning to cannabis-infused drinks. THC as the new social fuel: a cultural shift that has alcohol lobbies seriously worried.

Gen Z and THC

In the U.S., having a drink after work is looking less and less like happy hour and more and more like high hour. According to a survey by Drug Rehab USA, a third of millennials and Gen Z workers now prefer a THC-infused drink to a glass of alcohol.The study, conducted among 1,000 working adults, only confirms a shift that has already begun: as cannabis legalization gains ground and the ravages of alcohol become better known, a good proportion of the younger generation is choosing weed over vodka.

The figures speak for themselves: 66% of American adults say they have tried alternatives to alcohol in the last six months, and nearly a quarter of them say they have replaced all or part of their consumption with non-alcoholic or cannabis-based drinks. In this ritual of “unplugging” after a day’s work, alcohol remains in the majority (45%), but nicotine (24%), cannabis (20%) and alternative beverages (16%) are now well established. “Habits are changing, and so are generations“, notes Drug Rehab USA. And evenings out are no longer just about a whisky neat at the counter: relaxation also involves a can of THC, a non-alcoholic beer or a nicotine sachet. It’s a habit that respondents prefer, as it avoids the pitfalls of overindulgence in alcohol.

Scientists are following the trend. One study on rodents showed that CBD reduced blood alcohol levels and binge drinking. Another, published in Molecular Psychiatry, showed that a single 800 mg dose of CBD helped people with alcohol-related disorders better manage their cravings.In May, federally-funded research confirmed that smoking weed just before drinking reduced the number of drinks consumed. In Canada, where marijuana is legal, beer sales are already declining. These are all signs that are worrying the alcohol giants, faced with the green competitor.

Green menace

Analysts are panicking: according to Bloomberg Intelligence, the substitution of cannabis for alcohol is “growing rapidly” and poses a “serious threat” to the alcoholic beverage market. And the phenomenon doesn’t stop at pints and glasses of wine. Survey after survey shows that Americans are also using cannabis to reduce their consumption of cigarettes, painkillers and even opioids, and a YouGov survey revealed that the majority of Americans consider regular alcohol consumption to be more harmful than cannabis. But, paradoxically, many still prefer a glass of wine, even knowing the risks.

One joint a day keeps the doctor away

The numbers, again, point to a silent revolution: young adults are now almost three times more likely to use cannabis daily than alcohol. A study published in Addiction confirms that there are now more Americans who smoke weed every day than those who drink daily, and it doesn’t stop there: a survey by the National Institute on Drug Abuse shows that many feel that limiting alcohol would be good for them, whereas they don’t feel the same need with cannabis. >

The final nail in the glug’s coffin: more and more studies indicate that cannabis is not only a festive alternative, but also a less dangerous substitute for otherwise heavier substances, such as morphine or methamphetamine. In Canada, legalization has been directly associated with a decline in beer sales; in other words, the American evening is looking less and less like “Mad Men” and more and more like a THC seltzer commercial. Against this backdrop, a major cultural shift has taken place: weed, once criminalized, has become the “safest” option in just a few years. Cheers to THC before it’s your health that suffers!

With Marijuana Moments

Cannabis and psychedelics may be the most effective treatment for anorexia

An international study involving more than 6,600 people places cannabis and psychedelics at the top of the list of substances most effective in alleviating eating disorders. A revolution in the treatment of anorexia.

Cannabis and champis vs. antidepressants

Cannabis and psilocybin rather than Prozac? Published in JAMA Network Open, a new study led by the American Medical Association reveals that certain substances still banned in many countries are perceived as more effective than conventional drug treatments in treating eating disorders. Cannabis, hallucinogenic mushrooms (psilocybin) and LSD dominate the ranking of substances best rated by patients for relieving their symptoms, ahead of antidepressants, which are widely prescribed.

The survey questioned 6,612 people about their substance use over the past year and the impact of these substances on their eating disorders and mental health. The sample covered a wide range of drugs: caffeine, alcohol, nicotine, antidepressants, psychotropic drugs, ketamine, MDMA (ecstasy), stimulants, opioids…
Of all these substances, only a few were perceived to improve the symptoms of eating disorders. And to everyone’s surprise, it’s the classic psychedelics – cannabis, LSD, psilocybin – that get the best results. Conversely, alcohol, nicotine and tobacco are singled out as the most harmful. Antidepressants are deemed effective for improving overall mental health, but much less so for eating disorders per se.

Cannabic self-medication

Another finding: when it comes to self-medication to alleviate the symptoms of eating disorders, cannabis is the most popular substance. However, in terms of perceived effects per number of users, fluoxetine (Prozac) has the highest average.

The authors of the study – a team of nine researchers from the University of Sydney, New South Wales Health and King’s College London – point out that these results justify further research into the therapeutic potential of cannabis and psychedelics in the treatment of eating disorders.
They also note that, unlike LSD or psilocybin, ketamine and MDMA do not achieve such convincing results, suggesting that classic psychedelics possess specific properties particularly suited to this type of disorder.

The promising trail of “munchies

The study also puts forward a physiological lead: in cases of anorexia or so-called “aversive” eating disorders, cannabis could play a role by increasing the hedonic value of food, in other words, by restoring the pleasure of eating. A mechanism similar to that of the famous “cravings” or munchies, which other research, financed by the US federal government, has already explored to better understand the effect of THC on the brain. This work could ultimately contribute to the development of targeted treatments for pathologies such as anorexia or obesity.

Zeweed with MarijuanaMoments

Cannabis does not lead to other drugs, concludes major Japanese study

A new study of drug use patterns in Japan once again challenges the notion that cannabis is a gateway drug. It concludes that cannabis use in the country generally follows that of alcohol and tobacco, and that users rarely turn to other substances afterwards.

Published this month in the journal Neuropsychopharmacology Reports, this research – which its authors describe as “one of the largest and most important studies to date of cannabis users in the Japanese population” – also revealed that almost half of the respondents who named cannabis as their third drug “ did not go on to useother substances”.
“Cannabis use in Japan typically follows that of alcohol and tobacco, and rarely leads to other uses,” concludes the report, supported by the Japanese Cannabinoid Clinical Association and the Japanese Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare. ” These findings call into question the gateway drug hypothesis in the Japanese context.”
The study acknowledges that cannabis “is often labeled as a ‘gateway drug‘”, but stresses that “strong causal evidence for progression to other substances is limited “.

Unprecedented survey undermines theory of cannabis-hard drug escalation

Its findings suggest that, rather than leading directly to other drugs, cannabis use reflects “shared vulnerabilities” – involving factors such as age, education or socio-economic status – and that strict anti-drug policies can shape these trajectories.
The study is based on an anonymous survey conducted in January 2021 among 3,900 people in Japan who had used cannabis in their lifetime. Researchers then analyzed the data to assess the likelihood that these people had used other drugs after trying marijuana.
Rather than assuming a causal gateway effect of cannabis,” the authors write, ” the results underline the importance of taking into account the overall life context in which substance use takes place. Social determinants such as age, education and socio-economic position appear to shape consumption patterns independently of the pharmacological properties of cannabis.

Evaluation of the responses revealed that ” the probabilities of subsequent use of alcohol, tobacco, methamphetamine and other illicit drugs after cannabis use were 1.25, 0.77, 0.08 and 0.78 respectively – suggesting low probabilities of progression “.
While the results did show certain correlations between lifetime cannabis use and the use of other drugs, such as methamphetamine, the team of 12 researchers made it clear that these observations did not establish a causal link – the very heart of the gateway drug theory.
Our survey found that 10.4% of cannabis users reported having experimented with methamphetamine – a figure well above the estimated 0.5% lifetime use of this substance in the general Japanese population,” says the report. ” This suggests that cannabis users may indeed be more exposed to other illegal drugs, but it does not, however, establish causality.

Social factors more decisive than cannabis itself

The study focuses instead on the so-called “common vulnerability” theory, according to which ” the observed order and relationship between substances results not from one drug leading directly to another, but from common underlying factors – such as genetic, psychological or social influences – that predispose some individuals to poly-drug use.”” In Japan,” the team explains, “ strict regulation of cannabis may contribute to a situation where cannabis and other drugs circulate on the same black market, increasing users’ exposure to various substances.” It could therefore be the regulatory environment – and not the pharmacological properties of cannabis – that creates a gateway effect.
Another finding that supports this hypothesis, the report points out, is the relatively low rate of use of legal substances such as benzodiazepines and prescription drugs among cannabis users in the sample.
The authors do, however, acknowledge certain limitations to the study, such as the self-selecting nature of the survey conducted online via social networks, or the fact that respondents were recruited on the basis of their use of cannabis, and not other drugs.” To overcome these limitations,” they write, ” future large-scale cohort studies involving the general population will be essential.
But at the very least, based on the results of this current survey, the report concludes, “ we observed no pattern that supports the gateway drug hypothesis. ”

No increase in drug use in legalized US states

Meanwhile, in the USA, a study conducted last year revealed that the legalization of recreational cannabis does not appear to have contributed to what the authors describe as a ” substantial increase” in the use of Schedule II stimulants in the country. In fact, there is even evidence to suggest that cannabis legalization may have reduced the use of stimulants through substitution effects.
The authors of this study pointed out that the finding that the end of cannabis prohibition was not linked to an increase in stimulant use ran counter to their initial expectations.

The team had predicted that the legalization of recreational cannabis would lead to an increase in stimulant use, but found no evidence to support this.
While cannabis is often labeled a gateway drug by its detractors, numerous studies show that marijuana could, on the contrary, act as a substitute for certain drugs, at least for certain categories of users.
A survey released in 2023 by the American Psychiatric Association (APA) and Morning Consult found that Americans consider marijuana significantly less dangerous than cigarettes, alcohol or opioids – and find it less addictive than all of these substances, including technology.

Cannabis less harmful than alcohol and tobacco

A separate poll, conducted by Gallup, also showed that Americans consider marijuana to be less harmful than alcohol, cigarettes, e-cigarettes and other tobacco products.
With regard to alcohol, a study published in November 2023 concluded that cannabis legalization could be linked to a “ substitution effect “, with young adults in California ” significantly ” reducing their alcohol and tobacco consumption after the reform took effect.

Recent research in Canada has also shown a correlation between cannabis legalization and lower beer sales, again suggesting a substitution effect between the products. Other studies have established a link between cannabis legalization and reduced use of prescription and non-prescription opioids. A report published last November, for example, linked the legalization of medical cannabis to a ” lower frequency ” of non-prescription pharmaceutical opioid use.
A federally-funded study in 2023 found that cannabis was significantly associated with a decrease in opioid need among users without prescriptions, suggesting that expanded access to legal cannabis could be a safer alternative.Another study published the same year found that legal access to CBD products led to a significant drop in opioid prescriptions – with decreases ranging from 6.6% to 8.1% depending on the state.

Cannabis as a substitute for hard drugs?

Yet another study linked the use of medical cannabis to reduced pain and less dependence on opioids and other prescription drugs. A study published by the American Medical Association (AMA) also showed that chronic pain patients who received medical cannabis for more than a month significantly reduced their use of prescribed opioids.

The AMA has also published data indicating that around one in three chronic pain patients use cannabis as a therapeutic option – and that the majority use it as a substitute for other pain medications, including opioids.
Across the US states, cannabis legalization is also associated with a sharp drop in prescriptions for codeine, an opioid in particular, according to a study based on Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) data.

Another study, published in 2022, also showed that allowing patients legal access to medical cannabis helped them to reduce or even stop using opioid painkillers, without any deterioration in their quality of life.
Finally, there is no shortage of testimonials, data-driven studies and observational analyses to show that some people use cannabis as an alternative to traditional pharmaceutical medicines, such as opioid painkillers or sleeping pills.

Cannabis and driving: a study clarifies the duration of the effects and urges caution

At a time when the legalization of cannabis is making headway in many countries, a scientific study has shaken up preconceived ideas about the effects of THC on driving. Carried out on regular users, it reveals that driving ability can be impaired well beyond the perceived threshold of sobriety, previously estimated at 3 h after consumption.

Published in the Journal of Psychopharmacology, this study calls into question the self-confidence of cannabis users who believe they are fit to drive within a few hours of consuming the drug. Contrary to the widespread belief that driving ability returns to normal after three hours, the researchers observed that THC-induced impairment can persist for more than five hours. This was true even when the participants declared themselves “sober” and ready to drive.
The study, conducted on 38 adults aged 18 to 40, weekly cannabis users with at least two years’ driving experience, highlights a worrying discrepancy between self-perception and actual state. This discrepancy has potentially serious consequences in a context where cannabis use is on the rise, and with it, accidents involving THC-positive drivers.

A rigorous methodology to explore long-term effects

The research team’s objective was clear: to better understand to what extent and for how long cannabis affects driving ability. The majority of previous studies had stopped at a narrow time window, focusing on the first three hours after consumption. This new study adopts a more extensive and rigorous protocol.
Conducted under controlled laboratory conditions, it uses a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled design. Each participant took part in three sessions, spread over an entire day, during which they inhaled either a placebo, a low dose (5.9%) or a high dose (13%) of THC by vaporization. Driving simulations were carried out at four separate times over an eight-hour period. The researchers assessed parameters such as lane keeping, reactivity to traffic and overtaking behaviour.

Significant and prolonged effects on driving performance

The results are unambiguous: THC significantly impairs driving performance, and for longer than consumers realize.

  • Lateral vehicle control: after a low dose, disturbances lasted up to 3.5 hours. With a high dose, they lasted up to 5.5 hours.
  • Reactivity and distance management: participants exposed to a high dose showed less stable use of the gas pedal and longer reaction times, even three hours after inhalation.
  • Risk-taking when overtaking: high-dose users attempted more risky maneuvers, such as overtaking with little space available, indicating impaired judgment.

It’s worth noting that, despite these objective deficits, almost two-thirds of participants felt they were sober enough to drive just two to three hours after drinking.

THC levels in the blood: an unreliable indicator

The study also highlights the inadequacy of biological markers such as blood or salivary THC levels for assessing driving ability. The performance of some participants with high levels was sometimes superior to that of individuals with lower levels. These findings call into question the relevance of current legal thresholds, and argue in favor of more appropriate behavioral tests.
Towards a new regulatory approach

With over 52 million Americans claiming to have used cannabis by 2021, road safety issues are becoming a major concern. THC, the second most widely consumed psychoactive substance after alcohol, must be subject to evidence-based regulation. This study provides valuable information:

  • An evaluation of effects over an extended period.
  • Standardization of doses administered.
  • A test of multiple driving skills: attention, control, decision-making.

It also warns of the deceptive nature of subjective sobriety and the limitations of current detection methods.

Study limitations and outlook

The authors acknowledge certain limitations: the sample remains small, with few women, senior citizens or occasional users, which limits the general scope of the results. What’s more, the simulations do not fully reproduce the complexity of driving in real-life conditions.
To go further, the researchers plan to integrate brain imaging (fMRI), examine higher doses of THC, study the effects of tolerance in regular users, and develop tools to measure disability that are more reliable than simple biological markers.

 

In Switzerland, legal cannabis is already drying up the black market

While several European countries are groping their way along the road to cannabis legalization, Switzerland is moving forward methodically. Thanks to an extensive nationwide study, it has demonstrated that the regulated sale of cannabis is an effective way of drying up the black market – a model which its neighbors could learn from.

Supervised experimentation, promising results

While the purchase of cannabis is still being tested in Switzerland, the first results of the largest pilot project ever carried out in the country have just come in – and they speak for themselves: the black market is drying up fast. A dynamic which could well precipitate the regulated legalization of THC in the Confederation.
Unlike Germany, where uncertainty still hangs over the pilot projects announced by the previous government coalition, Switzerland is moving forward with sure steps. Before any legal sales are authorized, rigorous scientific studies are being carried out to determine whether specialized cannabis stores, like those in Canada and some American states, can keep dealers away and reduce crime.

Zurich at the forefront, users shun illegal routes

The most in-depth data are being collected in the canton of Zurich. The project involves the local university, an economic research institute and the Swiss Cannabis Research association, and mobilizes some 4,400 participants aged between 18 and 80 – a national record.
One year after the start of the experiment, the published data are very encouraging. Enough to encourage the Federal Council’s National Commission to give serious consideration to supervised cannabis legalization in the near future.
The study’s methodology is based on a simple but effective comparison: around a third of participants continue to obtain their supplies from dealers, while the remaining two-thirds can buy their cannabis in pharmacies or specialist stores. Unsurprisingly, it was the latter who reported a far more satisfying experience to the researchers.
The outlets were carefully chosen: they had to be accessible by public transport and located less than 30 minutes from the participants’ homes. This is an essential criterion if the legal offer is to be truly competitive with the black market, like the tobacconists and liquor stores on every street corner.

Ten grams of THC per month, under federal control

Each participant is authorized to buy up to ten grams of THC per month, a quantity controlled by the Swiss Federal Office of Public Health (FOPH). In Switzerland, it is estimated that users smoke up to 50,000 joints a day – a figure which gives an idea of the scale of the problem.
The data collected confirms a long-held intuition: regulated, supervised sales reserved for adults not only limit the risks associated with consumption, but also effectively reduce criminal activity. By buying their cannabis in approved stores, users no longer have to frequent illicit networks likely to offer other, far more dangerous substances.
The study also points out that if states fail to offer a simple, accessible alternative – such as specialized stores – and simply legalize personal or associative cultivation, the black market will persist. Cannabis users, like alcohol consumers, simply want easy access to their product.

Swiss example

While some large European countries and even the European Union are struggling to adopt a pragmatic approach, small, fiercely independent Switzerland is leading the way. By relying on science and rigorous experimentation, it is proving that well-thought-out legalization can be both safe for the population and formidably effective against trafficking.